🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Status

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

The American leader recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the primary solution to address disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this assault."