‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant opposed regulations in Africa which are law in UK

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.

Donald Nelson
Donald Nelson

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in tech innovation and startup ecosystems, passionate about sharing actionable insights.

May 2026 Blog Roll